1

Watch our latest Product Showcase

Group 370
2

Meet us at WeAreDevelopers World Congress in Berlin

Group 370
3

Spotlight Whitepaper by IDC on Importance of Automated Code Review Technologies

Group 370

How does code quality fit into your CI/CD pipeline?

In this article:
Subscribe to our blog:

Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) are key for organizations wanting to deliver software at scale. CI/CD allows developers to automate the building, testing, and deployment processes, reducing errors and accelerating software delivery.

In turn, code quality is essential to ensure the codebase is easily extensible and maintainable and the software we deliver is reliable and efficient. Code quality tools can identify issues early, improve code maintainability, enforce coding standards, increase security, automate code reviews, and drive continuous improvement.

As such, integrating code quality tools into the CI/CD pipeline streamlines the development process and reduces risks, allowing the delivery of high-quality software. This article will explore how code quality fits into your CI/CD pipeline.

CI/CD and code quality go hand in hand

Continuous Integration is the practice of automatically testing each change done to your codebase as early as possible. At the same time, Continuous Deployment follows the testing that occurs during Integration and pushes changes to a creation framework.

In general, CI/CD makes deployment faster and more effective. Through CI/CD, you can guarantee your system is working properly, giving you the confidence to develop new features and ship updates quickly.

For a proper CI/CD setup, you’ll need to spend some time identifying the right building blocks for your pipeline, as well as the relevant applications. For example, automated tests and code coverage must be part of your pipeline from the beginning, as they’ll have compounding benefits in continuous improvement and optimization.

The role of code quality tools

Code quality tools are designed to analyze codebases and identify potential issues, bugs, vulnerabilities, and violations of coding standards. As a result, they provide developers with valuable insights into their code quality, allowing them to make necessary improvements and prevent issues from escalating in later stages. 

By integrating these tools into the CI/CD pipeline, developers can automate code quality checks, ensuring that code meets the required standards before deployment to production.

Measuring code quality in a CI/CD pipeline

There are many tools to help development teams track and assess code quality. However, no matter the tool, your team might easily forget to check the code before pushing it. That’s why it’s important to integrate code quality tools into your CI/CD pipelines. Doing so ensures that code quality checks are run on every commit and Pull Request.

Tools like Codacy Quality use static code analysis to check your code quality and keep track of your technical debt. It makes early development faster and more efficient since you can catch errors before they end up causing significant damage, and it offers a broader scope than code linters alone.

At Codacy, we continuously integrate several linting tools, guaranteeing the linters are always up to date. We also constantly introduce new and relevant tools, so you don’t need to worry about a thing. In addition, we support 40+ programming languages and 20 000+ rules and allow you to disable any rule you consider a false positive with a click of a button.

Benefits of integrating code quality tools in CI/CD pipelines

  • Early detection of issues: By incorporating code quality tools into the CI/CD pipeline, developers can identify and address code issues early. This early detection helps prevent bugs and defects from propagating further downstream, saving time and effort in the long run.
  • Security enhancement: Many code quality tools include security checks to identify potential vulnerabilities and security weaknesses. Integrating these tools into the CI/CD pipeline helps developers identify and address security issues early on, reducing the risk of security breaches in production environments.
  • Consistent code standardization: Code quality tools enforce coding standards and best practices across the codebase. By integrating these tools into the CI/CD pipeline, developers adhere to the same guidelines, producing cleaner, more readable code, which promotes code consistency and reduces technical debt.
  • Continuous improvement: Code quality tools provide actionable feedback to developers, highlighting areas needing improvement. By integrating these tools into the CI/CD pipeline, developers can receive immediate feedback, continuously monitor their code quality, and make iterative improvements. This leads to higher code quality and better software overall.
  • Automated code reviews: Code quality tools can automate certain aspects of code reviews, reducing the manual effort required for peer code reviews. These tools provide feedback on code complexity, maintainability, and performance, helping developers optimize their code and adhere to industry best practices.

🎥 [Webinar] Code Quality and CI/CD Success

Join guest speaker Zan Markan, Senior Developer Advocate at CircleCI, and Kendrick Curtis, Director of Technology at Codacy, in discussing how to improve your code quality while ensuring CI/CD success.

RELATED
BLOG POSTS

Top mistakes your dev team makes when performing code reviews
Code reviews are an essential part of any software development process and are crucial for improving code quality. However, despite their importance,...
Small Pull Requests: 6 reasons why they are the best choice
We know it’s easier to create large Pull Requests, and it might be tempting to do so. After all, writing smaller PR takes practice and even demands you...
Why automated code reviews should be part of your workflow
Code reviews are one of the most important aspects of today’s software development workflow. With code reviews, your team can find issues early on,...

Automate code
reviews on your commits and pull request

Group 13