1

Join Codacy Product Showcase on July 9th to learn about product updates

Group 370
2

Meet us at WeAreDevelopers World Congress in Berlin

Group 370
3

Spotlight Whitepaper by IDC on Importance of Automated Code Review Technologies

Group 370

Code Coverage vs. Test Coverage: What’s the Difference? 

In this article:
Subscribe to our blog:

A software development team that takes code quality seriously prioritizes metrics like “code coverage" and "test coverage" when evaluating its work. While these concepts are intertwined and complementary, “code coverage” and “test coverage” are two different things development teams measure. 

However, both of these processes are vital for teams that want to closely monitor the completeness and quality of their code-testing activities. 

If your team wants to cover all its bases when testing, effectively scrutinizing every nook and cranny of your code, then understanding the distinctions between code coverage and test coverage and how to implement both effectively is pivotal. 

What Is Code Coverage? 

Code coverage measures the extent to which a program's source code is executed during testing. It quantifies how much of the codebase the test suite has exercised. 

Code coverage tools monitor a program's execution during testing, keeping track of which parts of the code have been executed and which have not. After running the tests, the tool analyzes the collected data to determine the percentage of code that has been executed. This analysis typically includes information such as the number of lines of code executed, branches taken, and conditions evaluated.

The result of code coverage analysis is usually expressed as a percentage. For example, if 80% of the lines of code were executed during testing, the code coverage would be 80%. Teams can set coverage targets and track their progress toward achieving them.

coverage coverage dashboard

Code coverage is considered a valuable code quality metric in software development because it helps assess the thoroughness of the test suite. Higher code coverage often indicates that more parts of the code have been tested, potentially leading to fewer bugs in production.

It can also highlight parts of the codebase that need to be more adequately tested, guiding developers in writing additional tests to improve coverage and increase confidence in the software's reliability.

However, it's essential to understand that code coverage is not a silver bullet for ensuring software quality. Achieving high code coverage does not guarantee bug-free code or comprehensive testing. It merely indicates which parts of the code have been executed during testing, not necessarily whether they have been tested thoroughly or effectively.

How Is Code Coverage Measured?

Code coverage tools work by instrumenting the code under test to track its execution during test runs. There are several common methods used to measure code coverage:

Statement Coverage

This method tracks which individual statements in the code have been executed during testing. It measures the percentage of statements that have been executed at least once. In this example, the assignment statement result = a / b, and the return statement return result would be considered covered because they are executed during the test case.

def divide(a, b):
    result0
    if b != 0:
        result = ab
    return result

# Test case for statement coverage
result = divide(10, 2)
print(result)

Branch Coverage

This method also considers control flow structures, such as if-else statements and loops. It measures whether the code's true and false branches of each decision point (branch) have been exercised.

In this example, the test cases cover both the true and false branches of the if statement in the is_positive function.

def is_positive(num):
    if num > 0:
        return True
    else:
        return False

# Test cases for branch coverage
assert is_positive(5) == True
assert is_positive(-5) == False

Path Coverage

This is the most comprehensive method of measuring code coverage. It aims to ensure that every possible path through the code has been executed at least once. While thorough, achieving full path coverage can be challenging and often impractical for large or complex codebases.

In this example, the test cases cover all possible paths through the classify_number function: positive, negative, and zero inputs.

def classify_number(num):
    if num > 0:
        return "Positive"
    elif num < 0:
        return "Negative"
    else:
        return "Zero"

# Test cases for path coverage
assert classify_number(5) == "Positive"
assert classify_number(-5) == "Negative"
assert classify_number(0) == "Zero"

Function Coverage

This method measures whether each function or subroutine in the code has been called during testing. In this example, both the add and subtract functions are called and exercised by the test cases.

def add(a, b):
    return ab

def subtract(a, b):
    return ab

# Test cases for function coverage
assert add(2, 3) == 5
assert subtract(5, 2) == 3

Line Coverage

Line coverage measures the percentage of lines in your code that have been executed at least once during testing. In this example, the if and else branches are covered, resulting in 100% line coverage.

def greet(name):
    if name:
        print("Hello, " + name + "!")
    else:
        print("Hello, World!")

# Test case for line coverage
greet("Alice")

Condition Coverage

This method evaluates Boolean conditions within the code, ensuring that both true and false conditions have been tested. In this example, the test cases cover the if statement's true (when num is even) and false (when num is odd) conditions.

def is_even(num):
    if num % 2 == 0:
        return True
    else:
        return False

# Test cases for condition coverage
assert is_even(4) == True
assert is_even(3) == False

What Are the Limitations of Measuring Code Coverage? 

Code coverage metrics only measure the extent to which code has been executed during testing, not the quality or effectiveness of the tests themselves. Additionally, relying solely on code coverage metrics to assess testing effectiveness can give a false sense of security. Even with high code coverage, there may still be untested edge cases, boundary conditions, or error-handling scenarios that could lead to bugs in production.

Achieving high code coverage can be challenging and time-consuming, particularly for large or complex codebases. Writing tests to cover every possible code path may require significant effort and resources, which may only sometimes be feasible or cost-effective. Implementing automated tests requires investment in tools, training, and skilled personnel. Initial setup and script development for automation can also appear daunting, and teams already accustomed to manual testing often resist change. 

According to our 2024 State of Software Quality report, most of the software development teams we surveyed still favor the manual approach across all types of testing. Over 40% of teams still conduct unit and frontend testing manually. Despite the advantages of automated testing, the low adoption level is easy to understand. 

state of code quality survey

Code coverage metrics can also be misinterpreted or misunderstood, leading to incorrect conclusions about the quality of the tests or the codebase. For example, achieving 100% code coverage does not guarantee that all possible code paths have been tested or that the code is defect-free.

Despite these limitations, code coverage remains valuable in the software testing arsenal when used judiciously and with other testing practices and techniques.

What Is Test Coverage?

Test coverage is a metric used to describe the extent to which an application's functionalities are tested from the end user's perspective. While code coverage focuses on the internal structure of the code—such as the percentage of source code executed during testing—test coverage is concerned with ensuring that all user requirements and scenarios are thoroughly tested.

Test coverage measures how well the testing validates that the application meets its requirements and provides the desired user experience.

How Is Test Coverage Measured? 

Measuring test coverage involves evaluating how thoroughly the tests examine the application's functionalities and how well they validate the intended user interactions and requirements. Here are some key aspects and methods used to measure test coverage in detail:

  • Requirement Coverage: Ensuring functional and non-functional requirements: Making sure that every documented function of the application is tested and validating performance, usability, security, and other quality attributes.

  • Scenario Coverage: Testing various real-world scenarios that users might encounter, ensuring that unusual or extreme user actions are also tested.

  • Use Case Coverage: Examining typical user interactions and variations of the standard use cases, including alternative paths and exceptions.

  • User Story Coverage: Ensuring each user story is tested according to its acceptance criteria and validating the entire user flow across multiple features and interactions.

  • Risk-Based Coverage: Prioritizing test coverage based on the perceived risk or importance of different software features, functionalities, or components. This method focuses testing efforts on areas of the code that are more likely to contain defects or have a higher impact on system behavior or user experience.

What are the Limitations of Test Coverage?

While test coverage helps you assess the thoroughness of your testing and identify gaps and deficiencies in your test coverage, much like code coverage, limitations do exist.  

Test coverage metrics may have a limited scope and may not capture all aspects of testing effectiveness. For example, they may not consider factors such as test case design, test execution quality, or test data adequacy, which can significantly impact testing outcomes.

As with code coverage, high test coverage does not necessarily equate to great testing processes. Untested edge cases, boundary conditions, or error-handling scenarios may still lead to defects in production.

Like code coverage, measuring test coverage can be complex and resource-intensive, especially for large or complex software projects. Test coverage metrics may also be subjective and open to interpretation, depending on the criteria used to define coverage goals and metrics. Different stakeholders may interpret adequate test coverage differently, leading to disagreements or inconsistencies in measurement and analysis.

Code Coverage vs. Test Coverage

Code coverage is a quantitative measurement. It measures the amount of code executed during testing and is expressed as a percentage of the total lines of code, branches, functions, or statements covered by the tests.

Code coverage focuses on whether the code has been executed during the tests. It is concerned with the completeness of testing regarding the lines of code run. It’s a white-box testing method, meaning the tests are designed with knowledge of the application's internal workings.

Finally, code coverage is most often used in unit testing, the goal of which is to test individual components or units of the codebase.

Test coverage is a more quantitative measurement.  It’s concerned with the quality and completeness of the testing process itself and evaluates how well the tests cover the functionality and scenarios the software is supposed to handle rather than just the code execution.

It focuses on the breadth and depth of testing and considers not just code execution but also the effectiveness and thoroughness of the tests. Test coverage is a black-box testing method, meaning tests are designed based on the application's specifications and expected behavior without knowing its internal code structure.

It’s usually applied at higher levels of testing, such as integration tests (testing combined parts of an application), system tests (testing the complete application), and acceptance tests (validating the application against user requirements).

Understanding the Complementary Nature of Test Coverage and Code Coverage 

Code coverage and test coverage provide complementary perspectives on testing effectiveness. Code coverage helps uncover parts of the codebase that lack test coverage, while test coverage evaluates the adequacy and completeness of testing efforts from various dimensions.

By combining code coverage and test coverage metrics, teams can better understand testing effectiveness and make more informed decisions about testing strategies, priorities, and resource allocation.

Together, code coverage and test coverage help improve software quality assurance by identifying areas for improvement in testing efforts and guiding decisions about where to focus testing resources to maximize the effectiveness of testing efforts.

Which One Is Right for Your Team?

Ideally, utilizing both types of coverage provides a comprehensive approach to testing that ensures the software is well-executed and thoroughly examined. However, how you measure code and test coverage should be based on your specific team and product goals. Some determining factors to consider when evaluating whether to implement code, test, or both types of coverage include: 

  • Project goals and requirements: If the primary objective is to ensure that all parts of the code are tested, code coverage is more relevant. High code coverage indicates thorough testing of the codebase. Test coverage is more important if the objective is to ensure that all functional requirements are met and adequately tested. High test coverage ensures that all specified functionalities are verified.

  • Nature of the software: In complex systems with intricate logic, code coverage can help identify untested paths and branches, ensuring robustness. Test coverage ensures that all specified requirements are tested in systems where meeting all requirements is crucial, such as in regulatory or safety-critical domains.

  • Development and testing processes: Projects using test-driven development (TDD) may focus more on code coverage initially to ensure that each piece of code has associated tests. Projects using behavior-driven development (BDD) emphasize test coverage to ensure that all behaviors described in user stories are tested.

  • Stakeholder priorities: Test coverage becomes critical if stakeholders prioritize functional correctness and meeting user requirements. If reducing technical debt and improving code quality are priorities, code coverage helps identify untested or poorly tested areas of the code.

The choice might depend on the availability and capability of tools for measuring and improving code or test coverage. Time and budget constraints influence whether the focus is on achieving high code coverage or comprehensive test coverage.

Codacy Coverage helps you enforce minimum test coverage for new pull requests with testing targets, ensuring your code meets your high standards. The repository dashboard provides an overview of test coverage evolution for the last 90 days, giving you a clear view of your team's progress and simplifying monitoring and analysis processes.

It also supports over 40 languages and frameworks, offers flawless integration with any CI/CD tool in your arsenal, and enables you to access coverage metrics directly from your Git platform, bypassing the need to switch between tools and platforms.

Start your free trial today—or schedule a demo with our team—to see how it works. 

RELATED
BLOG POSTS

Code Coverage: A Complete Guide
Building software is similar to building a skyscraper. It’s a meticulous process that demands precision, foresight, and attention to detail. Imagine...
Different code coverage types and the importance of a good report
You probably already know that code coverage tells us what percentage of our code is covered by tests. But did you know there are different coverage...
Try Out Our New Coverage Pipeline Featuring Diff Coverage
Timely and constructive feedback in the pull request (PR) flow is essential to maintaining code quality and fostering a culture of continuous...

Automate code
reviews on your commits and pull request

Group 13