Watch our latest Product Showcase

Group 370

Meet us at WeAreDevelopers World Congress in Berlin

Group 370

Spotlight Whitepaper by IDC on Importance of Automated Code Review Technologies

Group 370

Building a Proactive Defense: The New Frontier in Web Application Security

In this article:
Subscribe to our blog:

Application security is reactive. We wait for a new zero-day, or new entry on CVE, or until an incident occurs directly to us, and then scramble to patch our systems.

But by then, the damage has been done. Security incidents can be a one-and-done scenario. Trust with customers can be irreparably damaged, or critical data compromised, leading to financial losses and regulatory penalties. This reactive approach puts organizations in a perpetual state of catch-up, vulnerable to the next attack. 

The new paradigm in web application security is to adopt a proactive defense mechanism. By anticipating potential threats and vulnerabilities and addressing them before they can be exploited, organizations can protect their code more effectively and build a more robust, more resilient security posture.

This shift safeguards against immediate threats and secures web applications' long-term integrity and trustworthiness in an increasingly hostile digital landscape.

Why hasn’t this been used before? It is only possible with predictive analytics and machine learning models, which have only recently become sophisticated and accessible enough.

The computational power, advanced algorithms, and the sheer volume of security-related data necessary for these technologies to function effectively were not available or were prohibitively expensive.

Now, advancements in technology and a decrease in costs have made it feasible to implement these tools, enabling a proactive approach to web application security that was not possible in the past.

Predicting Security Threats

Predictive analytics uses data, statistical algorithms, and machine learning techniques to identify the likelihood of future outcomes based on historical data. It's about anticipating threats and vulnerabilities before they become active issues. Predictive analytics can help with security along several vectors:

  • Identifying Emerging Threats. Predictive analytics can analyze patterns and trends from vast data collected from network traffic, past security incidents, and external threat intelligence sources. Doing so helps identify potential future threats, such as new malware variants or attack vectors before they are used in widespread attacks.

  • Enhancing Threat Intelligence. It builds threat intelligence by providing information on current threats and forecasting future trends and attacker behaviors. This allows organizations to prepare and defend against threats that are likely to be encountered in the future.

  • Anomaly Detection. Predictive analytics tools can learn what normal behavior looks like within an organization's network and identify deviations that could indicate a security breach or malicious activity. This ability to detect anomalies helps in the early identification of potential security incidents, often before traditional signature-based tools can.

  • Risk Management. Predictive analytics can assess the risk levels associated with different assets, users, and systems within an organization. Organizations can prioritize their security efforts and resource allocation by predicting which areas are most likely to be targeted or to have vulnerabilities exploited.

  • Improving Security Posture. By continuously learning from new data, predictive analytics models can help organizations adapt their security strategies to the evolving threat landscape. This ongoing improvement cycle helps maintain a robust security posture over time.

Imagine a software development organization with a large, complex codebase continuously being updated and maintained. Given the scale of the code and the pace of changes, manually reviewing every code change for potential vulnerabilities is not feasible. This is where predictive analytics comes in.

First, the organization collects historical data on known vulnerabilities in its codebase, including where they were found, the type of vulnerabilities, and the characteristics of the code that contained them. This data is complemented with source code changes, commit messages, and developer notes.

From this data, features that could be indicative of vulnerabilities are extracted. These might include complexity metrics (e.g., cyclomatic complexity), code change patterns, the use of particular functions or libraries that are risky, and the historical frequency of vulnerabilities within specific modules.

A machine learning model is trained using this data. The model learns patterns associated with code that has historically led to vulnerabilities. Techniques such as natural language processing (NLP) can be used to analyze commit messages and comments for risk indicators.

Once trained, the model can analyze new code commits in real-time or near-real-time, predicting the likelihood that a given change introduces a vulnerability. The model scores changes based on their risk, allowing security teams to focus their manual review efforts on the highest-risk areas. The predictive model is continuously updated with new data as additional vulnerabilities are discovered and fixed, improving its accuracy over time.

The outcome is three-fold:

  • Proactive Vulnerability Management. The organization can proactively address potential security issues before they are exploited by predicting which parts of the codebase most likely contain vulnerabilities.

  • Resource Optimization. Security and development resources are optimized by focusing efforts where the risk is highest rather than spreading them thinly across the entire codebase.

  • Early Detection. The approach helps in the early detection of vulnerabilities, potentially even before the code is merged into the main branch, reducing the window of opportunity for attackers.

By integrating predictive analytics into the development and security workflows, organizations can significantly enhance their ability to identify and remediate vulnerabilities promptly and efficiently, thus maintaining a stronger security posture.

Automating Security Responses

Predictive analytics for threat assessment is the first piece of the puzzle; automating responses to those threats is the second.

Automated responses can be seen through two lenses.

The first is alerting. Let’s say the predictive analytics above identifies a potential SQL injection vulnerability in a new code commit based on patterns learned from historical data.

The predictive analytics system flags the code commit as high risk. A SOAR platform receives the flag and automatically generates an alert ticket in the issue tracking system, tagging it under a high-priority security review. Relevant development and security team members are notified via email or messaging platforms about the potential vulnerability, with links to the detailed report and flagged code segment.

The SOAR system logs the event and its details for future reference and auditing purposes.

For an SQL injection, a code security tool can scan the codebase for similar patterns and suggest secure coding practices, such as parameterized queries or input validation routines, to developers for manual implementation.

The second is automated threat reduction. Effectively, having artificial intelligence (AI) fixes the problem itself.

During its routine operations, a DAST tool identifies an exposed endpoint in a web application vulnerable to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). The vulnerability detected by the DAST tool is communicated to the SOAR platform, specifying the nature of the vulnerability and its location within the application.

Upon receiving the alert, the SOAR platform uses an AI model to assess the severity of the vulnerability based on factors like the data exposed by the endpoint and historical data on XSS exploitation attempts against similar applications.

If the AI determines the vulnerability as an immediate threat, it triggers an automated code remediation process. This process involves generating a patch script that applies context-aware output encoding directly to the vulnerable endpoint's code.

The AI model selects the appropriate sanitization library and generates the necessary code modifications to properly sanitize user inputs before processing.

The generated patch is automatically submitted to the version control system as a pull request and flagged for urgent review by a human developer.

The SOAR platform notifies developers via their preferred communication channel, emphasizing the critical nature of the patch. Alongside the patch, the AI system drafts a test plan to validate the fix and a rollback plan in case the update causes unforeseen issues. These are attached to the pull request for the development team's action.

Once the development team approves and merges the patch, the SOAR platform initiates a follow-up DAST scan to mitigate the vulnerability effectively. If the vulnerability persists, the process is flagged for manual review.

For an XSS vulnerability, the AI-generated code might involve adding or enhancing input validation and encoding mechanisms, such as:

# AI-generated code patch for sanitizing user input
from html import escape

def sanitize_user_input(input_string):
    """Sanitizes user input to prevent XSS attacks."""
    return escape(input_string)

# Application of the sanitized function to vulnerable endpoint inputs
user_input = sanitize_user_input(request.GET['user_input'])

Integrated with security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) solutions, predictive analytics can help automate responses to security alerts with a high probability of being malicious. This can significantly reduce the time to respond to threats and minimize their impact.

Preventative Security

Proactive defense is part of a new thrust in AppSec, trying to shift security left. The idea is to focus security efforts earlier in the pipeline to address and mitigate faults before they become an issue.

Predictive analytics and machine learning will be at the forefront of this shift. The ability to constantly monitor and deal with potential threats automatically is a huge win for security engineers and developers. They can move from a constant fear of being hit by the latest zero-day to building robust defenses for their applications and getting in front of any would-be attackers.

AI and ML aren’t quite there yet for exactly what we need, but with the pace of advancements in this sector, it might be only a matter of months before prediction and automation become the standard for application security.


Navigating the World of SAST: What is Static Application Security Testing?
Static application security testing (SAST) is a core component of robust DevSecOps. By analyzing source code, bytecode, or binaries to pinpoint...
Application Security: A Complete Guide
In 2023, the average cost of a data breach reached $4.45 million, the highest in seven years. With cyber threats becoming more sophisticated and the...
Navigating Application Security Testing (AST): Methods and Best Practices
The application layer remains a prime target for cyberattacks. In fact, nearly 50% of data breaches over the past several years originated at the web...

Automate code
reviews on your commits and pull request

Group 13